Preparing
for the Systems of Knowledge Technology project.
The project involves practical work in a field of study chosen by the
student to show how technology affects the quality of life.
Technology is a
study of the mechanical arts and the applied sciences.
Thus, it has a great relevance to the quality of life.
Scientific principles can form a good basis for technological work, but
empirical (experimental) results are essential.
Therefore, technology must solve problems to make human existence better.
The textbook
relevant to this project is ‘Zen and the Art of Motorcycle maintenance’ by
Robert M. Pirsig. The
chapters relating most to the project are numbers 24,25 and 26.
Chapter 24 :
Here Care and Quality are discussed in relation to technology.
A person who sees Quality and feels it as he works is a person who cares.
The traditional scientific way of looking at a problem by analysis from
an objective point of view will sometimes cause one to become ‘stuck’, that
is unsure of what step follows logically.
The required hypothesis explaining the problem is sometimes hard to come
by. But, if there is care in
getting the required result, the problem will most certainly cease to exist as
one sees a new meaning in the problem and how to achieve the result by an
alternative way.
Chapter 25:
The existence of ugliness in technology does not mean that this ugliness
is inherent. Technology deals
with the making of things, so it is in itself an art (techne means art).
Neither is the ugliness inherent in the materials.
Ugliness comes from our habit of associating Quality to subjects or
objects of technology. Ugliness,
or lack of Quality, comes from a lack of identity that the creator and the user
of technology feels with it. To
overcome this we must cultivate a peace of mind when creating.
From this follows right values, and subsequently right thoughts.
Right thoughts produce right actions and resulting in work which is a
reflection of serenity in the centre of it.
Technology should be a material reflection of a spiritual reality.
Chapter 26:
Here the term ‘Gumption’ is defined.
A word with a similar meaning is enthusiasm.
A person who seeks quality will be filled with enthusiasm for his work.
A person can act in ways that fill him with gumption while some actions
tend to dissipate it. A
quality relationship between subject and object is what the aim should be.
Things that reduce this (gumption traps) should be avoided.
The two types of gumption traps are those arising from external sources
(setbacks) and those coming from within.
An orderly way of working and the cultivation of inner peace together
with appropriate rest periods will help to keep the supply of gumption high.
The internal gumption traps are divided into value traps, truth traps and
muscle traps. The most
important are the value traps where the right value is not ascribed to an
action. This occurs because
of value rigidity where there is a strong commitment to previously held values.
Overcoming this, one experiences a sense of discovery when a new fact is
revalued. Another gumption
trap is ego where one has too high self-esteem.
Anxiety is another gumption trap and the way out is to get the right
information. The next trap is
boredom, when bored one should stop!
Impatience is similar and here one can allow more time for working.
Truth traps are
about understanding truth. Sometimes
the truth does not follow from a yes/no statement but can lie in a third logical
dimension. In this case, the
question must be rephrased. Finally,
the muscle trap comes from working in uncomfortable surroundings and with
unsuitable tools.
After studying
the relevant chapters in the book, the first step in the technology project is
for the student to identify a field that affords a good study of technology.
The range is vast but it follows from the book that the
choice must be a personal one. It
might be useful, however, to consult reference books such as The Oxford
Illustrated Encyclopaedia of Invention and Technology ( R.608.7) ISBN
0-19-869138-6 at the reference library, Beltissebħ.
This will provide some preliminary information in a chosen field, since
the decision is binding once the application is filed.
Once the
application is approved, research can be started in the particular field.
A portfolio will be created with the results of the research work.
At this stage one can decide on a model that can be built to show that a
technological solution must have inbuilt care and quality in order to be a good
solution.
The data
obtained from the research will help at the model design stage and can take the
form of diagrams and logical thought on paper before construction work starts on
the model. The student will meet
problems during the course of model building and these should be overcome if the
gumption supply is kept high. Following
the practical suggestions offered by Pirzig will produce a model that on testing
and improvement will have the required inbuilt Quality.
A report on the
model building as an exercise in problem solving will have to be presented at
the time of the interview, when the decisions regarding the model will be
defended if necessary, to show that the whole process is a good practical study
into the quality of a technological product.
The write up can be divided into three chapters as follows:
I:
Page of Historical information
II:
Discussion of research on field of study
III:
How the model was made
Diagrams,
calculations, sketches and photographs are to be included in the writeup where
they are relevant. A list of
contents and numbered pages would enhance the presentation.
A bibliography, showing the sources consulted for information would be
proof that the research was conducted in a serious manner.
The name of the
project, name and surname of candidate, group and I.D. number should appear on
the front cover and the same information is also to be affixed to the model.
The application form is pasted on the inside of the cover.
Check if there is a requirement for a handwritten page to be included in
the writeup. Also, check on
the size restrictions on the model.
I will discuss willingly the role of science in
technological applications with any student preparing for the project.
Just call at the science museum in room 452 at the Junior College.
A petition presented by students proposes the following
changes to the rules governing the Systems of Knowledge project:
(1) That the subject of Systems of
Knowledge ceases to be mandatory for university entry qualifications.
(2) That Students choose only one
project that is Aesthetic or Technological.
(3) Students wish that the
syllabus should reflect better Culture and Science in Malta.
RL 4/6/01